The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment.
What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
The increased production of consumer goods results in a plethora of harmful environmental effects. There are a number of reasons behind this problem, and several effective solutions that can be adopted by the government and consumers to salvage the situation.
Firstly, more demand for good production is synonymous with a scaled up requirement for material from natural resources such as wood, water, plants, electricity, which could lead to a despoil of natural habitats. For instance, more paper products are produced, more trees are cut down, and that can result in deforestation and even soil erosion. Besides, new production factories are being built and more chemical waste and emissions are released into nature, which definitely causes water and air pollution as well as threatens the existence of many marine and terrestrial animals. Finally, in the goods industry these days, there is a massive amount of disposable goods. They are non-biodegradable and can remain as waste for thousands of years, turning our planet into a huge landfill and causing the death of many creatures.
There are several actions that must be taken as soon as possible to reduce the negative impacts on our environment. The government should lay down strict laws and penalties for manufacturers that emit waste illegally and go beyond the standard so that the harm caused to the environment is minimal. Furthermore, it is ideal to have governmental support for renewable energy development with generous economic incentives like tax breaks. At the moment, many states in the US offer tax exemptions and incentives for businesses using green energy, and they can also purchase renewable energy at cheaper prices. Consumers also play an important role in reducing the bad effects. As consumers, we should change our throwaway behavior and utilize 3R, which means reduce, reuse, and recycle as much as possible. For example, we could have broken items repaired or plastic products reused rather than just throwing them away.
In conclusion, there are various reasons why the growth of consumerism contributes to climate change. Therefore, the government and every individual should join hands and take actions together in order to save our earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Some people believe that personal happiness is directly related to economic success while others argue that happiness depends on other factors Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo Japan listened to music over the previous month The pie chart shows a record company s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music Summarize the information by selecting and 78
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lants, electricity, which could lead to a despoil of natural habitats. For instance, more...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...nd terrestrial animals. Finally, in the goods industry these days, there is a massive...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, so, therefore, well, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35127478754 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84127927717 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628895184136 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0801826221 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192830658227 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574605043723 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647240671455 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125296366277 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116621333142 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.