Bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
From the Bar graph, the carbon emissions of USA, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Canada and India of three distinct years can be taken.
Looking at the graph, one can possibly say that, the Carbon emissions of USA, China and India has been risen throughout the years. Whereas Germany has managed to reduce it considerably and the emissions of united Kingdom has remained fluctuated.
In 1975, carbon was emitted highest by USA recording 1,200,000 thousand metric tonnes followed by China which emitted approximately 500,000 thousand metric tonnes. India positions itself as the lowest carbon emitter of the year giving out only about 50,000 thousand metric tonnes. The difference between the highest and lowest is likely around 1,150,000 thousand metric tonnes.
After 15 years, USA still leads others and with increased amount which is 1,300,000 thousand metric tonnes, a rise of around 100,000 thousand metric tonnes. China marks the similar trend ranking the same position but with the increased emission of 650,000 thousand metric tonnes. But the lowest position is snatched away from India by United kingdom giving out Carbon around 150,000 thousand metric tonnes. Other than the mentioned countries, Canada and India has made a leap in their emission amount and Germany maintaining the constant rates as the earlier year.
The year 2005 did not visualize any change in the first two positions but witnessed a tremendous jump in the values of United States and China which is 1,600,000 thousand metric tonnes and 1,500,000 thousand metric tonnes respectively. Both shows an increase of more the 200,000 thousand metric tonnes. Although, the emission of United Kingdom and Canada has increased in the past 15 years, they share the least emission among other countries. India has shown an increase to 3,00,000 thousand metric tonnes meanwhile Germany has a drop to 1,00,000 thousand metric tonnes
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-13 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
2022-08-15 | kavi jk | 67 | view |
2022-06-02 | khoapham | 73 | view |
2021-06-21 | dhillonsukh | 67 | view |
2021-06-07 | Bala_s10 | 73 | view |
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 58
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 83
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think is is a positive or negative development 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...be taken. Looking at the graph, one can possibly say that, the Carbon emissions of USA, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny change in the first two positions but witnessed a tremendous jump in the value...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 965.302439024 167% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35215946844 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40092015929 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495016611296 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1978301979 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914247671389 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477303723574 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403768377901 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785288698099 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467330251678 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...be taken. Looking at the graph, one can possibly say that, the Carbon emissions of USA, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny change in the first two positions but witnessed a tremendous jump in the value...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 965.302439024 167% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35215946844 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40092015929 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495016611296 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1978301979 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914247671389 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477303723574 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403768377901 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785288698099 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467330251678 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.