Some people argue that technological innovations, such as mobile phone, are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary, the advent of techonology contributes to create a lot of inovations such as mobile phones. Some individuals opine that this creation of techonology making the people less socialize with others. I agree with said notion due to lonelieness of the yougester as well as creation of internet and this eassay will articulate my views in the forthcoming paragraphs.
There are a plethora of reasons to keep strenghten my point of view. First and foremost, parent are busy ownig to their busy schedule nowadays. So, they let their childern alone in home. To elaborate it, youngesters are used to play games on their mobile phones to make theirselves busy as well as these habits led to increase the feeling of loneliness in them. If they would play games more and more on mobile phones, then it will affect to their body to make less avail to do physical task in their life. Thus, they make themselves less socialize by spending a lot of time alone in home for using the mobile phones.
Furthemore, not only games, but the invention of internet also make individuals to keep busy on mobile phone. To illustrate it, there are innumerable social media apps that assist to people indulge theriselves keep busy on these apps. For example, facebook, instagram, whatapp and twitter are most preferable apps for using by the individuals. In spite of it, these apps also help residents to make habitual towards these apps. Hence, in this kind of ways internet aid masses to make them less socialize with others.
In conclusion, undoubtely techonology inventions are useful for people, but some inovations are considered bad creations for human being such as mobile phones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-23 | arsh wahid | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | arsh wahid | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | arsh wahid | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | arsh wahid | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | arsh wahid | 73 | view |
- Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change Others believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that is only governments and large businesses which can make a difference Discuss both 73
- Some people believe that advertising aimed at children should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Should smoking be banned completely 56
- Some believe that people today have no interest in maintaining the traditional culture of their country or region other believe that it is still important to people that we preserve a traditional way of life Discuss both these views and give your own opin 73
- Some people think that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98581560284 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7178763342 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535460992908 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2647058293 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227041852061 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745593766664 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664700790468 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131362291811 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332170157008 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98581560284 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7178763342 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535460992908 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2647058293 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227041852061 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745593766664 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664700790468 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131362291811 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332170157008 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.