Should animals be used in testing new drugs and procedures?
Gives reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Animals and humans are almost the same kind, as they have the same response to most of the drugs. It’s okay to use any kind of brute or animal in drug experiments. This essay will discuss the debate about using animals in testing drugs, whether researchers have the right to do it or not.
The drug research is a complicated process, time-consuming, and costly; and the end result is never known at the outset. It was estimated that, on average, it takes eight-and-a-half years to study and test a new drug that can achieve the desirable result without too serious side effects. In the past, scientists were using humans as guinea pigs and hundreds of people were killed due to various experiments. As a result animals were used instead of human beings.
“Killing a hundred animals is superior to killing one human”. Hence animals were used in wars, labs, and experimental fields. To this point, the search for a new drug has been confined to a laboratory test tube. Next, scientists have to test those compounds that have shown at least some desired effects in living animals. Drug companies make every effort to use as few animals as possible and to ensure their humane and proper care.
More often than many scientists care to admit researchers just have to give up when a drug is poorly absorbed, unsafe, or simply doesn’t work. The pharmaceutical organization estimated that only 5 in 5,000 compounds that enter preclinical testing make it to human testing, and only 1 of those 5 may be safe and effective.
To sum it up, issues such as ‘cruelty’ to animals and the humane treatment of animals are valid concerns, and hence, the use of animals in experiments is greatly regulated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Ngô Quốc Thắng | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Trần Nguyễn Quang Đại | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-10 | phamkhuyen | 61 | view |
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 73
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...were killed due to various experiments. As a result animals were used instead of h...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...mals is superior to killing one human”. Hence animals were used in wars, labs, and ex...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, may, so, at least, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83561643836 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75014286805 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582191780822 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7650879821 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199887360249 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717933504538 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371075870422 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112759771395 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343789152912 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.