The tables give information about the average hours work by part-time and full-time men and women in three countries in Europe in 2002 and compare them with the European countries.
A glance at the tables provided reveals the similarities in the figures for the average hours worked by part-time and full-time males and females in 2002 in three European countries, namely Greece, Netherlands and UK.
Overall, the average European number of hours for full-time workers exceeded that of part-time workers during the year in question. Another outstanding feature is that the quantity of hours on average for working full-time for males was more common. However, the figure for hours working part-time for women was the most minor popularity.
When it comes to the average figure for hours for full-workers, it is evident that Greece ranked first with 39.9 hours for females and 42.5 hours for males. The Netherlands followed the lead, accounting for 38 hours for both sexes, followed by the UK, whose men and women have 37 hours and 37.5 hours respectively.
The number of hours on average for part-workers was considerably lower than that of full-workers. Similar to the full-time workers, Greece registered the highest figure with 29,3 hours for women and 30 hours for men, followed by the Netherlands, occupying 29.2 for the former as well as 28.3 for the latter. The UK had the third highest number, constituting 28 and 29 respectively in females and males.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-12-07 | DEEP PANCHAL | 67 | view |
2022-09-13 | linhdk35 | 73 | view |
2021-11-18 | adamneyul | 74 | view |
2020-02-15 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that one of the best ways to solve environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 73
- The tables give information about the average hours work by part time and full time men and women in three countries in Europe in 2002 and compare them with the European countries 73
- There are some advantages and disadvantages of the cinema Do you agree with this statement 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, third, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14761904762 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74636432521 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509523809524 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3504869507 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271077058939 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155948744744 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883124284714 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218637671223 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085155916595 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.