The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia
The bar chart illustrates how the price of a cup of coffee changed in six different cities between 2010 and 2014 in Australia. Overall, the coffee price in Melbourne experienced the biggest change; in contrast to Brisbane where the price was the same over the period.
Melbourne’s coffee price saw the biggest rise of 20.8%. In 2010, a cup of coffee only cost 2.4 dollars. However, after just four years, the price increased by 0.5 dollars; and consequently, it cost up to 2.9 dollars to buy coffee in Melbourne in 2014.
In comparison, Sydney placed second at 13,2% where the price of a cup of coffee rose to 3.17 dollars from 2.9 dollars between 2010 and 2014. This is followed by Perth, Adelaide at around 7% where the coffee costs grew to 2.25 dollars and 2 dollars, respectively. Over the same period, the percentage of Canberra was lowest, at 6.25% with the increase of 0.2 dollars to 1.7 dollars.
Compared with other cities, Brisbane was the only city which recorded no change in its coffee price. To be specific, Brisbane people paid 2.25 dollars to buy coffee in 2010 and the price was constant in the following four years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | tieuquynh | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | ililmaidatuz | 80 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | ililmaidatuz | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop a social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both views. 61
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations. 89
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 74
- Teachers used to convey information, but now with wide resources of information, there is no role for teachers to play in modern education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, second, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76381909548 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52256301378 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532663316583 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.747671673 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428868903273 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187741747762 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143986424294 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275960624828 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113258253206 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.