Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
It is argued that whether luck plays the most significant role in success of individuals. I partly agree with the statement as other factors also responsible for the achivement of one in life.
Luck apper under the form of randomness, in which people are just luckily hit their targets because the odds at the time was stacked on their sides. Take science as an example, many scientists in the past were not capable of reaching their intended final results due to lack of modern equipment and technology. On the contrary, their peers nowadays tend to make more evolutionary researches thanks to support from governments and suffice of state-of-the-art devices. In addition, individuals may possess necessary qualities and characteristics that facilitate their career or academic progress, albeit the need for luckinesses is irrplaceable. It is common that well-qualified candidates for a position may be recruited because the current staff for the job may get pregnant or sick, these incidents can not be controlled and accidentally happen. That is why a stimulus of luckiness may result in unexpected positice consequence for many.
However, to say that luck is the primary contribution of people's success in life is absurd as the statement is not well-grounded. Effort and consistency are of great importance when persons aiming at attaining certain things in life. For instance, workers who are targeting at getting promoted, often have to work extra hours, receive difficult tasks and attatch themselves to their job. Thus, without attempt and hard-work people may not be able to achieve their dreams. Similarly, when encountering hardships, successful people are not likely to quit. They may make mistakes, but their persistance enables them to keep facing new challenges until they can address these problems comprehensively. After many times of failure, people can develop their confidence and accummulate valuable experiences. The fighters therefore stand a higher chance of reaching personal breakthroughs than their ordinary counterparts.
In sum, luck is an intergral part to anyone's life. However, other components are also vital such as endevour and will.
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and g 84
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school and unable to find jobs after graduation What problems do you think youth unemployment will cause to the individual and society Give reasons and make some suggestions 89
- Some people think that the main purpose of schools is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43195266272 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08060203365 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64201183432 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8803766838 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139137832143 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419376531005 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376100387788 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842661059266 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035963993028 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.