Environmental damage is a problem in most countries. What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility?
Protection of the environment has become a controversial issue nowadays. I believe that humans could be mainly attributable to the phenomenon and we should also be responsible for any affects of the development.
There are two main reasons behind the negative impacts upon the environment, which are the invasion and industrializing of natural areas by human beings. The first cause of the phenomenon is manufacture of goods and services. These operations demand natural resources and materials, which contribute greatly to the deterioration of the environment. This is because the production process to produce these inputs often leaves large amount of carpon footprint, waste and emission which are the main culprits of pollution. More importantly, overpopulation also places the ecosystem at risk. The increase of population and expansion of urban areas silmutaneously boosts the demand for food, shelter to feed and accommodate growing number of people worldwide. The movement steadily jeorpadises the natural envionment by causing loss of habitats for wild animals and vegetation, thereby exacurbating environmental issues.
The responsibility for the deterioration of the environment should fall on individuals, business owners and the authorities. People, in general, regularly favor the convenience over the harms on their world. The mindset subsequently results in increase in use of plastic packaging, widespread of fast-fashion and consumerism. The lifestyle encourages the disposal of artificial compounds, which are dangerous to the environment. Another responsible party for the damage of the natural world are tycoons, given their crave for maximizing profit and neglect impacts on the nature. For example, some greedy firm’s owners can go so far to dump wastes directly to land and water bodies, in order to avoid processing the disposal which can cost them certain amount of money. Finally, if political leaders overlook the preservation of the environment because of corruption or lack of duty, they should also be blamed for consequences of negative natural catastrophes. These individuals are the ones who contribute the most of the degration of nature in recent years.
In sum, development of industrialized areas and rise of population are threatening the planet. Ordinary people, business owners and governments should together hold responsible for destroying the nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | đam kim doan | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ttltpttdc | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Kaito Mori | 11 | view |
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 84
- All fathers should be entitled to time off from work when their children are born What is your opinion 73
- The number of people interested in cosmetic surgery is increasing in order to improve their physical appearance Why do people do operations to change the way they look Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eby exacurbating environmental issues. The responsibility for the deterioration of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, so, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70391061453 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24982203804 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8600728661 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.473684211 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36842105263 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141320811812 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398231214115 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414382788097 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082526494465 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398231765147 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.