Some people believe that life has become intolerable due to the existence of technology. However, I think the opposite is true, and the complexity of life originates from different sources.
Technology, instead of making life more complicated, is a crucial factor forming the evolution of humanity. In terms of employment, the invention of computers, the Internet and various devices has significantly improved our working productivity. At home, machines have freed people from time-consuming and mundane chores. In agriculture and industry, technology not only helps workers save their labour but also increase their yields. Because the influence of technology is increasingly pervasive, many people have taken it for granted. While it is true that a number of equipment or gadgets are excessively sophisticated to manipulate and require high skills to use, they are not the main reason making our live more complex.
In my opinion, overpopulation constitutes the major source of the extra complication of our life. The increasing strains put on both natural environment and human societies have become intolerable. In many parts of the world, the scarcity of food, accommodation and job opportunities is caused by overpopulation, not technology. While people in those countries are scrambling for basic supplies and suffering from various illnesses, technology might play a minor part in their lives. Conversely, in societies with sufficient resources for dignified living conditions, psychological factors trouble many people, for they are obsessed by items or things that they do not really need or afford. Therefore, our lives would be simpler if we solve those problems, not by reducing the use of technology.
In conclusion, I am opposed to the idea that using less technology will make our lives simpler because the difficulties of life often result from different causes.
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, really, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49655172414 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15700154254 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1738259173 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.266666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22546484471 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706588424291 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531858371421 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153873563755 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420317610234 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.