Companies use major sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has become increasingly common that firms utilizing popular sporting events to advertise their offerings. Some people believe that this trend has negative impacts on the development of sports. I somewhat disagree with this view as the involvement of companies in sports generally brings more good than harm to sports.
The first reason why I advocate the companies' support of sports is that it would stimulate local economy growth. This is because companies often invest in holding the events in exchange for their products' appearance on live TV programs, news, or social media. Given the sponsorship from the businesses, organizers of the events can allocate more resources in captivating visuals, contents, which help attract more audience. If the events succeed in appealing more people to the areas where the events are held, local businesses will be tremendously benefited.
Another explanation for my objection to the belief that interference of companies impair sports development is althletes' merits from the movement. Famous professional athletes are normally paid by sponsors to endorse their products in the special events. This collaboration provides the professionals with a plethora of benefits including decent income, nutritional supply, and so forth, which allow the athletes to raise their living standards, focus on their professional career, and thereby being able to enhance their performance.
Admittedly, there are some companies may over-abuse sporting events to advertise low-quality products. By doing so, these businesses not only damage the reputation of the sporting occasions but their goods may have detrimental impacts on the buyers' health.
In sum, I somewhat oppose the argument that promotion of products in sporting events generally has a negative affect on sports. The investment of the companies acts as a stimulus for the posperity of the local community and success of athletes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and g 84
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Technology has changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buyers'' or 'buyer's'?
Suggestion: buyers'; buyer's
...ods may have detrimental impacts on the buyers health. In sum, I somewhat oppose t...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 111, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...porting events generally has a negative affect on sports. The investment of the companies...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59183673469 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91450357107 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58843537415 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8409889021 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.64285714286 7.06120827912 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329007898777 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11151422629 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624491415907 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186001796188 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490707941459 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.