Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many individuals believe that direct communications between the interviewers and interviewees, are not the optimized method to measure whether job candidates are suitable for jobs or not. I somewhat agree with this viewpoint as other approaches are more effective to do so, even though interviews are sometimes useful to assess certain aspects of job applicants.
The first reason why I oppose the only use of interview for the selection of workers is that the ability of job candidates can be demonstrated through their past experience. This is because when people have spent time working for their previous companies, it implies that the workers have already been able to meet the requirements of their previous workplaces. If they were unable perform the assigned taskes by their former employers, they would have not been employed by the firms.
Another explanation for my view against intervew is that qualifications are also reliable sources of valuing job applicants. This is because university, colleges are historically established and trusted by the society for educating human resources for the economy. Therefore, by graduating from such organizations, individuals proved that they have complete neccessary training and study needed for the positions they apply to.
Admittedly, interviews provide recruiters a chance of learning more about the potential candidates in terms of their goals, interests, personalities. These factors are of great importance to employers in order to assess whether these candidates are competable with companies' values, pursuits, and missions. However, it is impossible that businesses' owners can meassure applicants with just initial interactions. In this sense, evidence ssuch as working experience and qualifications is more trustworthy.
In sum, I mostly disagree with interview utilization to opt for potentail workers for businesses. Even though the utilization of face-to-face conversations may allow the head hunters to know more about the personal characteristics of the applicants, experiences and degrees are more believable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-01 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 78 | view |
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 47
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 61
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of this How to overcome this problem 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...dates can be demonstrated through their past experience. This is because when people have spent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75806451613 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21081192464 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609677419355 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8255579015 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195780859994 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611732370026 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524164725005 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101568200589 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475575274636 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.