Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment.
Why is this? What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles?
Nowadays, communities are persistently utilising vehicles despite being cognizant of their negative effects on the environment. In this essay, I would like to identify the causes of this situation and propose some corresponding solutions.
Probably the main factor is the accessibility and comfort of automobiles and motor vehicles. In other words, the possession of a personal vehicle provides availability and convenience for both the passenger and the driver. To exemplify this, when it is required to commute, employees can simply drive comfortably and peacefully without abiding by any time schedules or rules of the public transportation system. Furthermore, drivers can cover a longer distance in a shorter amount of time because they can control the acceleration and deceleration of their vehicle, hence reaching their desired destination on time. Another contributing factor to this is the fear of the physical condition of public transportation methods, where they’re perceived as dangerous and unreliable. In addition, safety concerns were identified as a barrier to people using public transportation as a means of transportation. Stated differently, people fear the criminal behaviour a passenger might commit, such as theft and pickpocketing due to the anonymity, openness and overcrowding of the public transportation system. Consequently, public services and the government find it strenuous to control and monitor such vast systems.
On the basis of the above reasoning, comprehensive solutions have been identified. The first solution is that the government should invest more in transport infrastructure, to make it more reliable and comfortable for passengers. This can be attained through ameliorating railway systems and initiating more stations in areas that are inaccessible. Moreover, improve bus services by employing conductors who prevent overcrowding and anti-social behaviour. The next solution is to make cheaper and more standardised fares so it is more affordable for riders. The final solution is to encourage people to cycle more since it is not only beneficial for the environment but also for an individual’s health. This can be achieved by raising awareness and initiating campaigns about the advantages of cycling in conserving energy and non-renewable resources which are constantly consumed by car drivers. As a result, the public will be motivated to use public transport to commute instead of cars and motorcycles and reduce the rate of harmful emissions.
In conclusion, many people favour the utilization of personal automobiles due to various reasons. So the key is, I believe, to take actions such as improving transport infrastructure, reducing costs and raising awareness of the negative effects of commuting by car and motor vehicles.
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as friends help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Many governments have laws that ban the sale and use of hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine yet they allow people to buy drugs such as tobacco and alcohol Laws that prohibit the sale and use of hard drugs should be applied to all drugs including tobacco 89
- Most major cities around the world continue to grow at a phenomenal rate due to the massive increase in population This has led to a general decline in the quality of life in city areas as the environment becomes more crowded and polluted Give some reason 84
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities Do the advantages of information technology outweigh the drawbacks 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should be responsible for solving this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2375.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66825775656 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3497149124 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570405727924 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5247918049 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.95 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213857317206 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541480892704 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402736504834 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109953841974 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342347039794 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 78.4519038076 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2375.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66825775656 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3497149124 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570405727924 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5247918049 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.95 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213857317206 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541480892704 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402736504834 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109953841974 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342347039794 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 78.4519038076 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.