The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast-food restaurants between 2003, 2006, and 2013. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the number of times individuals in the USA went to eat instant food diners in 2003, 2006, and 2013.
Overall, a large proportion of the people in the USA in the three years preferred eating at restaurants but not daily.
The graph shows that the year 2006 had the highest number of people who ate in diners several times a week, 20% followed by 2006 with 17%, and 2013 with a total of 16%. The ratios of those who attended once a week were above 30% in 2003 and 2006 and at 27% in 2013. The number of guests who frequented cafes once or twice a month was 30% in 2003, this figure however dropped by 5% in 2006 and rose to a high of 33% in 2013. The percentage of people who went to eat at fast food joints a few times a year was 13% in 2003 whilst 2006 and 2013 recorded similar statistics, of 15%.
Those who never visited and those who went daily to eateries were below 5% in 2003, 2006, and 2013.
- Vehicle technology is advancing rapidly and cars that drive themselves have already been developed In the near future most people will use driverless cars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 267, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...0% in 2003 and 2006 and at 27% in 2013. The number of guests who frequented cafes o...
^^^
Line 6, column 425, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...2006 and rose to a high of 33% in 2013. The percentage of people who went to eat at...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.17679558011 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1131134171 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508287292818 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6802686398 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229880065338 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117444117167 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240483405295 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136597550865 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388625795881 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.4 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.1 10.3012195122 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.26 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.