In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
In this day and age, it is true that people possibly shop, work and communicate with each other using various virtual means. While there are clear positive aspects of this trend, my conviction is that the detrimental aspects would definitely outweigh them.
On the one hand, technology has conspicuously elevated our living standards from different perspectives. Firstly, thanks to the introduction of remote work and online shopping, people now no longer squander time stuck in traffic congestion, alleviating transportation situations as well as emissions released by vehicles. Secondly, distance learning facilitates students to obtain an international certificate at a more affordable cost since commuting and accommodation expenses are eliminated. Finally, shopping online enables customers to approach every product type at the click of a button. Taking the lockdown period during the covid-19 pandemic as an example, residents in urban settings which emerged as the epicentre of infection relied totally on digital appliances for vital merchandise ranging from food to pharmaceutical products.
On the other hand, the proliferation of technology in working, shopping and communicating also poses grave threats to both individuals and the entire society, which would even supersede the potential gains. Firstly, worries are mounting over cyber security, owing to myriad malicious attacks launched by rivals, hackers, and cybercriminals. For instance, in Vietnam, private information of people possessing a bank account is in stock and misused by various entities from real estate brokers to usury agents. Secondly, online shopping is also attributed to the increase in carbon footprint stemming from shipping and transit, coupled with unwanted aspects such as delay of good delivery, discrepancies between online descriptions and received products, etc. Finally, people are on the verge of being socially isolated due to the overuse of internet connection. As a conversation is possibly done without a face-to-face meeting, our need for visiting each other is dramatically reduced and in the long run, there is a growing propensity that many young people may lead their entire lonely life in small rooms but not a community.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the benefits provided by the possibility of conducting daily activities online, I believe that its unfavourable impacts would cause more harm to people’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | minhphambinh1234 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | cinderel | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 89
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 89
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72375690608 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11534611217 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665745856354 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.2532538741 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224222781799 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623082288869 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742175886305 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124566058887 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826757586105 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.