As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In this modern era, to study other country languages apparent inefficient way due to the easier translation by advanced technology device. Partially, I consent to the same point of view for several reason which I will elaborate in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, perhaps, studying the other country language is the effective way owing to the limitation of device ability. The technology probably not only provides inappropriate interpretation of the original meaning of the sentence inflicting misunderstanding but also relying on the internet and electricity might bring difficulties for the user. Furthermore, if people are not able to communicate in foreign language, they would be difficult to get information from others effectively, especially masses who study in other country using local language in the class.
On the flip side, in my point of view, the sophisticated technology apparently induces individuals to translate a plenty of languages easily. To illustrate, google translate provides numerous of languages which people could convert to the other languages either by text, picture or even just sound. In addition, long-time period might be need to studying a language. This approach would be inefficient way for people who have an occupation in many countries possessing various languages. In fact, a plethora of them; in part-time platform, are incapable for such language instead of just using app translation.
To sum up, it seems to me that the sophisticated application such as language translation apparently bring several benefits including enabling to translate in various language and ease the work. This is as long as the translation could result in appropriate meaning.
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 70
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some feel that individuals should try to assimilate completely to the country where they live while others feel it is more important to preserve their native culture Discuss both views and give your own 61
- Some feel that individuals should try to assimilate completely to the country where they live while others feel it is more important to preserve their native culture Discuss both views and give your own 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...I consent to the same point of view for several reason which I will elaborate in the following...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, if, so, in addition, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48863636364 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16568556282 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6571765861 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133303277967 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519213022355 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369328858786 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865816657206 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364362110622 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.