As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time?
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Artificial Intelligence plays a leading role in almost every single field, mainly interpretation services in this day and age. While this trend is considered to deliver the essence of context in an elaborative way as language professionals do, taking up a new speech becomes an outdated or even fruitless activity. I agree with this to the degree that there is virtually no need to acquire global languages for people; however, robotic technology cannot always replace the position of humanly-approached translations.
To start off with, already has AI been advanced to figure out common problems of individuals such as avoiding time-consuming stuff in translating official or non-official daily contexts. Although people still rely on the service of linguists to accomplish tasks in their jobs, computerized interpretation like Google Translate is a godsend. In a matter of second, for example, any large document can be translated accurately – meaning that time and money are saved for any other important task after copying and pasting online. Indeed, I have been using this service of Google for several years, and it set aside more time and funds for me in order to do extracurricular activities. Thus, digital brains are super crucial in dealing with time as well as cash when interpreters offer exclusively high price along with an extended period.
Even though there are advantages of robot interpreters, they are not ready to convey the full meaning of the everyday language of different countries. To be more precise, languages are categorized with their grammar rules according to their geographical locations where natural features, slangs and words differ. Uzbekistan can be a solid example in this case since people find Google Translate program challenging to comprehend complex language. As I use it day to day basis, the outcome of the program needs better scrutiny from professionals because the Uzbek language is the family of Turkish ones. Therefore, learning a foreign language is still significant and not a time-consuming activity as long as a translation by software has the wrong language use.
In conclusion, nevertheless, computers have been helping millions of people translate what they need, language learning is fundamental these days owing to the geographical categories of countries where the idiomatic language is distinct.
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in school curriculum To what extent do you agree or disagre 89
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Other think than it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some believe that education success is based on good teachers and others believe that is depends upon student s attitude Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many people choose to work or live abroad because of the higher standards of living they can find outside their home country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think paying taxes is a big enough contribution to their society while others think people have more responsibilities as members of society than only paying taxes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 368 350
No. of Characters: 1952 1500
No. of Different Words: 229 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.38 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.304 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.076 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 148 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 118 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.096 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.311 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.035 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5