In some cities, there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and other buildings, and owners can decide on the style of their houses. Do the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks?
Nowadays, concepting the personal building regarding to the appearance and material seems lack of regulation in particular metropolitan areas. I consent to be more disadvantageous sides which will be elaborated in the forthcoming paragraph.
On the one side, in my stand point, to be lack of some regulations imposed for designing and constructing a building probably increasing the number of illegal housing (semi-permanent home) especially in restricting area such as under bridge. Not only do the outlay of the city spoil, but also the unhealthy life will increase; regarding to the unproper sanitation. Furthermore, if such policy is not imposed, the number of land clearance would incline, due to developing business area including hotel. In terms of the environment, more and more pollutant would be resulted bringing on unprecedented climate change.
On the flip side, perhaps, this issue probably allows people to construct some buildings in the low-cost rate which is positive development for whose low-income rate. In conjunction with the expenditure, masses could reduce cost of material (owing to there is no standard) and constructing the house gradually is likely. In addition, the building consultant agency could fulfill all of the owner needs including the concept and location without restriction. To illustrate, to build natural-hotel concept, the agency could opt location aside of the river to be more immerged in nature resulting the objectives could be fulfilled.
To sum up, lacking regulation to restrict such design and material could bring several merits for some extent. However, I claim that spoiling the city concept including leading people to be unhealthy and lacking of green-opened land are its demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Andi Irwan Nur | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Andi Irwan Nur | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Andi Irwan Nur | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Andi Irwan Nur | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-13 | Andi Irwan Nur | 78 | view |
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 70
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Employers nowadays put more emphasis on social skills Some people believe that social skills are important in addition to good qualifications for job success Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways Discuss both the view and give your opinion 80
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...uilding consultant agency could fulfill all of the owner needs including the concept and l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, in addition, in particular, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48507462687 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09225492862 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6588776542 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140360216667 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486685552316 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422442662759 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781599145984 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381614299811 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.