More tasks at home and work are being done by robots. Do the pros outweigh the cons?
Like many other domains, houses and workplaces have witnessed the increasing involvement of robots in recent years. From my perspective, this phenomenon brings about more good than bad due to the lengthened time for entertainment and creative activities.
Firstly, there are some drawbacks caused by this trend, including deteriorating labour skills and potential risks arising from technological defaults. Regarding fundamental skills like cooking skills and self-care skills, robots doing housework could take away opportunities for children to learn them and become more independent as mature people. Moreover, some errors in robots that can not be avoided, might harm people or lead to remarkable losses to firms if they are systematic problems.
However, in an era when leisure time is becoming more and more luxurious to many people, the time saved by robots could improve families’ life quality and companies’ economic efficiency dramatically. In terms of household chores, if robots do more housework, all family members, especially the mother, will have more time for relaxing, entertaining, playing sports and even participating in social activities. As a result, human well-being would be greatly advanced as people could now take care of both their physical and mental health. Another successful appliance of robots is in offices and factories as more repeated and boring tasks are being removed from workers’ responsibilities, which later gives organizations a significant workforce to carry out innovative plans or labour-intensive but profitable tasks like selling, marketing, and researching, to name but a few. Spontaneously, employers can also reduce a huge amount of production costs as machines require no wage and no rest. For these reasons, the pros of this tendency could easily overshadow its cons.
In conclusion, although humans pose some possible dangers, it is evident that automation in homes and workplaces has brought about enormous social and financial benefits.
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 78
- The diagram shows the design of a modern land ll for household waste 78
- The diagram shows a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, well, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68438538206 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.105845009 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687707641196 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7784686451 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.583333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207882179648 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629877465433 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425604622577 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985751054754 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641024423439 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.