Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Rules and laws are the basis of most modern-day societies. Some people believe that society could not function if people were free to do as they please. I partly agree with this idea, and will discuss the issue in the following essay.
Many people fear that society would deteriorate into chaos if there were no rules or laws in place to control people’s behaviour. They believe that rules and laws exist in order to set boundaries so that people behave in a way that is conducive to a peaceful and functioning society. I believe this is true to a certain extent. For example, if there were no laws or rules, and therefore no police to enforce those rules, then a certain number of people may try to take advantage of such a situation and some upheaval may result as a consequence. However, this would only be temporary, as I believe that the majority of human beings are good people and would ultimately unite against those who were causing distress to the rest of society, once again resulting in a peaceful state.
However, I do believe that the amount of laws and rules that people are subjected to in most modern-day societies causes more harm than good. Most laws and rules these days benefit a minority of people, while the majority are still being affected by the very rules and laws that are there to protect them. For example, in many countries it is illegal to own a gun. However, when a criminal breaks into their home and attempts to murder them with a dangerous weapon, they are unable to defend themselves effectively. Furthermore, many rules and laws these days favour the rich and oppose the poor. That is why in most countries the gap between the rich and poor is getting bigger and bigger.
In conclusion, I believe there only needs to be one universal law, “Do no harm to others”. The innate goodwill and intelligence of human beings will naturally create the most peaceful and productive human societies possible, without the endless amounts of unnecessary rules and laws of today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-14 | tieuquynh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | Trần Ánh Vy | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | rahulgumber | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | kiransandhu706@gmail.com | 76 | view |
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so medical services should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fr 89
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive What are your opinions on this 84
- Topic The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors who came to the UK for different purposes between 1989 and 2009 73
- The table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74928774929 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50669188221 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501424501425 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9713469649 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237014283064 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835791997642 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738891065898 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165853250952 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695317308263 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.