As machines have become more sophisticated, more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
In contemporary society, an increasing number of occupations and missions with hard physical work could be completed not manually by the sophistication of machines. From my perspective, I think the beneficial side of the trend surpasses its detrimental effects.
On the one hand, there are also several demerits which are triggered by the existence of technologically advanced appliances. First of all, the workforce’s wages could be plunged. The main reason is that employees are only necessary for monitoring, maintaining and providing intelligent machines with ingredients. For example, since the bubble tea makers nearly do all tasks, what staff would normally do is just pour substances and control the temperature to compose bubble tea, and then serve it to customers. Apart from this consequence, labourers could also be in danger of being unemployed. The key rationale is that when cutting-edge engines occupy a large work proportion, there would be a noticeable quantity of workers who do not have any missions to complete. Thus, people’s living standards would have deteriorated.
On the other hand, I concur with the school of thought that complex machinery could support working individuals involved in difficult labouring tasks. That is because they are faster and more accurate than humans. For example, all weaving factories in Vietnam in which there is a participation of engines have better productivity than manual production sites. As a result, it would enhance manufacturing efficiency and companies will be more modernized. In addition, the employees’ amount of workload could be alleviated. As hi-tech machines are in confrontation with complicated tasks, workers would just be responsible for daily facile assignments such as examining machines’ states; thus, their stress might be relieved and replaced by comfort and relaxation at work.
In conclusion, while there are a number of downsides like the workforce’s salary decrease and unemployment, I hold a firm belief that the merits of accuracy, speed and alleviation in labours’ duties are superior to its weaknesses.
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 89
- In some countries schools are teaching English to primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished Others think the parents should be punished instead Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- In recent years there is a trend of responsible tourism which pays attention to both local culture and the environment However there are still people who think that responsible tourism is impossible to implement in reality To what extent do you agree or d 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, thus, while, apart from, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57453416149 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20819478709 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624223602484 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8194875751 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181283252933 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539563629329 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399844322652 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920199816126 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056855754342 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, thus, while, apart from, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57453416149 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20819478709 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624223602484 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8194875751 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181283252933 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539563629329 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399844322652 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920199816126 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056855754342 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.