Alternative energy source that use the natural power of the wind, waves, and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal, oil, and gas that we use to power our cities and transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the entire world, non-renewable energy is irreplaceable with old-fashioned sources to supply the power of city's infrastructures due to cost and installation. Personally, I share the same perspective of this issue for reasonable points which will be elucidated more below.
Nowadays, many researchers essay to find new sources especially from nature (wind, waves, and sun) for replacing common energy resources which usually use in the world (coal, oil and gas). The fact is natural power having unlimited quantity rather than fossil fuels, hence countries could utilise as a main energy sources to power their supporting facilities for a long time. As a result, the world might disregard the issue of energy scarcity. Moreover, conversion process of alternative sources is eco-friendly also. Therefore, companies of energy suplier are ease to establish many generating machines and supporting facilities without considering enviromental issues.
On the other hand, instead of resolving the problems of energy provision, unlimited sources affect other troubles in the infrastructures both on converter machine and transmission. Generally, alteration renewal of sources requires state-of-the-art technology in the facilities, whereas artificial machines of resources could be found in most countries in the world. As a consequence, the enterprises could handly imitate the infrastucture technologies. Besides, uncomplicated transformation process from rare materials to energy either in city's electricity (coal and gas) or in transportation fuel (oil) offers cost to build the facilities becoming more inexpensive. Not only would it improve profits for the authority, but it allows consumers obtaining low cost to utilise the energy for their necessities as well.
In summary, it appears to me that shifting fossil fuels to renewable energy brings drawbacks owing to the technology being common in the world and needing more finance to create the supporting facilities. Nevertheless, it would provide benefits, if might limited resources consider about the environmental safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-08 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | akmalfikri1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | akmalfikri1 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | milad_salehi2002 | 73 | view |
| 2015-09-02 | broerjuang | 79 | view |
- It is always wrong to keep animals in captivity for instance in zoos How far do you share this view 78
- Some people think that in this modern world getting old is entirely bad However other people believe that the life of old people is much better now than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs What problems do you think youth unemployment causes for individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 78
- Alternative energy source that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs What problems do you think youth unemployment causes for individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 509, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... of alternative sources is eco-friendly also. Therefore, companies of energy suplier...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, whereas, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80327868852 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28419864856 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.866342738 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205580840364 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623519458922 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662428226177 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114004238784 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764448679663 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.