Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
In this day and age, people depend on numerous factors to divide their students into classes. A group of individuals believes that educational places should select their students due to their academic abilities whereas others think students with distinct abilities should be studied together. From my perspective, both of these statements have its upsides and drawbacks. Nevertheless, I approve of the second idea though I will further elaborate both sides.
First of all, filtering students according to their academic abilities will assist teachers in their educating process. Obviously, professors just need to prepare only one accurate and attractive lesson with the same level for whole students that they can save time managing tasks. It is undeniable that, students with academic abilities may interested in high-quality hypothesis and can speedly understand them. Therefore, they may have chances to improve their learning result. Moreover, studying in the environment that consists of all genious mates can promote as well as stimulate individuals in learning more industriously. As a result, they can achieve diverse crowning goals in their lives
On the other hand, studying with different abilities together create opportunities for students to coorperate with others as their social skills can be increased. Factually, they have to learn by pairs and groups rather than by individual that they may understand how to work fluently and effectively with each other through teamworks. Furthermore, students can also experience numerous levels of knowledge that they will study from basic to academic, step by step, become better. They can learn with convinient atmosphere and improve more productively.
In conclusion, each opinion consists of several advents and disadvantages. Therefore, the government as well as educational sites should consider carefully before posing decisions based on any factors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of adults in urban and rural areas who took part in four free time activities in 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information and compare where relevant by selecting and reporting the key features 73
- The plan shows the bookstore in 2000 and the bookstore in nowadays 84
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging food While other argue that customer should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68292682927 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90272971845 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.148197151 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.733333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8666666667 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356912016802 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108745189042 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108443299166 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203630288351 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11677961696 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.