Some people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that only small differences between the richest and the poorest members. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Class distinction between rich and poor has been always considered as a hotly-debated topic that often divides opinions. To a certain extent, this disparity is the principal reason affects directly to the concept about prosperity in people’s perspectives. As far as I am concerned, I have almost no doubt about that a happier society which can be achieved by ensuring that the richest and the poorest beings have only small differences.
It seems to confirm the idea that when coming to happiness, currency and love are the two obvious vital elements. Money represents for material contentment, in contrast feeling stand in for mental cherishness. In fact, rich people usually rely on their property into luxurious brand as well as lavishness party as a pastime while those who live in a bad conditon without belongings have to save every penny for other objects. Additionally, most of gladness of the poor come from the time they spend for gathering with their family on which is not often available in wealthy families. Therefore, mutual jealousy is inevitable and these are the two root causes of the family for not having a certain happiness.
Furthermore, there is no doubt that level of earning impact upon the status of society and its happiness. Colossal source of income would bring poor people to equal life-style of society or to reach their dream easily and this will create a sense of equality among them. For instance, in the most of the Asian countries, especially Korean, people of high social class do not like to make friends with a person who is living in slum conditions; owing to the fact that they think that will lower their position. Anyhow, from my perspectives, when they have the same income and the life-style then a non-individual likes to think about others’ background status.
In conclusion, the inequality among wealthy and poverty is unavoidable in today’s modern society. From my points of views, balancing these states and keeping it to an appropriate level is the ultimate solution otherwise due to the fact that a massive difference would lead to a series of many crictical issues particularly a smaller amount of a happy society.
- Some countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world To what extent is this a positive or negative trend 61
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 84
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in crime rates Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 87
- It is suggested that all young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the young people 84
- Behaviour in schools is getting worse Explain the causes and effects of this problem and suggest some possible solutions 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'has' and 'been'.
Suggestion: has always been
...Class distinction between rich and poor has been always considered as a hotly-debated topic tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01657458564 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80094695905 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599447513812 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7006017756 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104774403056 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306498806626 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444517086863 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640472791924 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653345725447 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.