Some people argue that strict punishment for driving offenses is the only effective way toward improving safety on the road. Do you agree or disagree?
Recent few decades has witnessed a considerable rise in number of vehicles on urban roads. Along with this there is increment in driving offences too, and to solve this growing problem government of many countries have enforced strict and stricter rules for offenders. This essay provides empirical evidences in agreement with it.
To begin with, it is the fact that stricter punishments are the most effective measure for road safety. To explain, fear of punishment brings discipline and keeps bad driving habits at bay. For example, strict punishments like heavy fine, suspension of licence and imprisonment all these compel drivers to drive safely with all required precautions. Thus, such steps ensure safety by developing sense of responsibility in driving habits of people. Consequently, benefit society with minimized causalities, injuries, loss of public and private property and provides happy, safe, mature and responsible society.
Moreover, society and government need to focus on traffic education along with punishment. In other words, making people aware of laws through mandatory seminars and compulsory classes before providing licence to drive prevent frequent road accidents. Adding to it, stiffening the licensing procedure also ensures qualified drivers on the road and brings down number of road accidents to big extent. Furthermore, investing in traffic infrastructures, such as improving road safety, should be a prior option. As driving on the safe roads minimize frequency of accidents and degree of their damage. Singapore, case in point, government subsidized heavily in traffic system, the rate of traffic accidents is quite low. However, life is very precious, so development, awareness and strict punishment are only options to minimize traffic causalities.
To summarize, offensive driving must be penalized heavily in order to bring safety on the roads sense of accountability in drivers along with that government must focus on development of safer roads and licensing only mature and responsible drivers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | roopdeep | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | aycorek | 71 | view |
| 2018-12-07 | vishal sachdeva | 95 | view |
- Nowadays, people throw away old things and adopt new things. Does the disadvantage of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 84
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Children from age 7 11 now spend more time watching television and or playing video games than before What are effects of this on children families and society What are possible solutions to this problem 90
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture What are your opinions on this 73
- Write a letter to a friend and ask him her to look after your house in your absence give reasons for your travel and any specific instructions requests 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63961038961 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9315916554 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6792058135 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5625 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214393652183 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065508406645 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510697708971 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12447387856 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425799859363 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63961038961 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9315916554 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6792058135 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5625 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214393652183 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065508406645 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510697708971 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12447387856 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425799859363 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.