1. Technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, thanks to the great leap development in terms of the technology, human race can live in a modern civilization. However, opinions differ as to whether it can have more unfavorable influences on society. Although some individuals think that the technology can cause more issues for humans, I would opine that the benefits it can bring outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are a chain of factors which contribute to the belief that the technology can be negative to modern society. The most fundamental one is that the development of technology indirectly contribute to the deterioration of the environment as it motivates the speed of industrialization. For example, a great number of oil-exploitation machines have been used and they dispose a lot of harmful fumes to the environment, which can cause global warming phenomenon. Furthermore, many experts are apprehensive about the rapid progression of robotic technology because they think that robots will gradually substitute for humans in doing a lot of things. For instance, Hanson Robotics, a scientific company which specializes in artificial intelligence, have invented Sophia robot, which is able to communicate like humans. If we do not have appropriate approaches, robots may dominate the world in the future.
On the other hand, there are plenty of technological inventions that are beneficial for human race. Firstly, the invention of computer has opened a modern epoch and given humans a chance to approach to the quintessence of information technology. Without the computers, there would not have 4.0 or 5.0 technology. Moreover, thanks to the computers, the standard of living has been enhanced and many people do not need to do manual works like in the past. Secondly, the technology has contributed majorly to the ambition of discovering the universe and finding other planets which have suitable conditions for the existence of life. Therefore, in the future, our next generations can live in other planets and escape from the Apocalyptic scenario.
In conclusion, admittedly, the startling progression of the technology may be disadvantageous in some aspects, we cannot deny that the technology can have a lot of benefits on the development of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- To meet the growing need for food to support an increasing population a country should make use of edible insects as a food source However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but harvesting them will also negatively affect nature What 78
- 1 Technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 73
- 1 Technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... civilization. However, opinions differ as to whether it can have more unfavorable influences...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'chains'?
Suggestion: chains
...rawbacks. On the one hand, there are a chain of factors which contribute to the beli...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34745762712 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23628843479 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9092995793 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177705202381 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592164020629 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03584467611 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109536176918 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276303782234 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... civilization. However, opinions differ as to whether it can have more unfavorable influences...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'chains'?
Suggestion: chains
...rawbacks. On the one hand, there are a chain of factors which contribute to the beli...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34745762712 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23628843479 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9092995793 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177705202381 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592164020629 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03584467611 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109536176918 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276303782234 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.