Task 1. The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
The map shows a number of changes which took place in a small theater between 2010 and 2012.
Overall, the theater had witnessed a significant development with the expansion of it and the allocation of areas except for the auditorium and main entrance.
Looking in more details about the top of it, the storage room was relocated from the right to the left side of the stage in order to make room for the media area in 2012, located to the north of the stage before. Besides, the hall was constructed in the former place of the media room but it’s area is smaller because of the expansion of the stage to the north. Interestingly, the auditorium stayed unchanged but next to it, the showers room was built in 2012.
Regarding the rest of the theater, there were the ticket office and the admin office to the left of the main entrance, but they were combined to create the restaurant which included 8 chairs. The cafe shop located in the right-bottom corner of the design in 2019 was demolished in 2012 and the ticket office replaced it. Lastly, thanks to the expansion to the left, the admin office was replaced opposite to the restaurant.
- Task 2 In the modern world schools are no longer necessary because there is so much information available through the internet that children can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 2 Research indicates that nowadays some consumers are much less influenced by advertising than in the past What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any 78
- Task 2 Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets should have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both these views and give you 73
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of first year students who gave very good rating to the resources provided by the college for three courses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 73
- The plans below show the ground floor of a library in 2001 and how it was developed in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, lastly, look, regarding, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62254901961 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49664807972 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504901960784 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6081046793 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164430778023 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846470816739 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139628152028 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146488517561 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175358566352 0.0819641961636 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.