Many people argue that the internet has made it easier than ever before for youth and workers to accomplish their educational and career goals. I completely agree with this notion due to the conveniences, cost-efficiency and the greater availability of information labor markets.
First and foremost, the e-learning method is superior to conventional classes in the following aspects. Due to unlimited operating hours of the internet, users can learn whenever they want. Those learning traditionally, however, have to attend schools at a fixed time. Additionally, e-learning courses usually offer their lessons for free or at little charge, while those learning conventionally ought to pay a sum for tuition fees, books and even facilities on a monthly basis. As a result, e-learners are able to save money and allocate it to other critical areas, making their lives more comfortable.
Apart from that, the online career information is superior to conventional methods. More specifically, the internet can provide up-to-the-minute information about the labor market, enabling users to obtain the news in a matter of minutes. For example, by accessing career recruitment news on various flatforms, unemployed workers are able to find jobs suiting their qualification, working experiences as well as hobbies quickly. Those seeking a job through a newspaper or a career introduction center, however, have to spend quite a long time looking for a suitable job, which is time-consuming. Furthermore, users have more chances to get a deep insight into a company before being employed formally via staff’s comments on the internet, which helps them to find a truly good enterprise.
Inclusion, I believe that the internet has provided youngsters and staff with greater conveniences and the availability regarding learning materials as well as recruitment news. I also contend that there will be more and more individuals using the internet to improve their personal goals in the future due to its significant benefits.
- Young people are committing more crimes Discuss the causes and solutions for this problem 84
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 11
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 73
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...ailability regarding learning materials as well as recruitment news. I also conten...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, well, while, apart from, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47115384615 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15673563436 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6509426113 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.928571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18545827619 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577572759877 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641768377069 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117202094693 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050393956374 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.