which is a better companion book or entertainment, discuss your opinion?
You are not alone in the world of books, is the popular saying that is meant for people who are fond of reading books. In this entertainment era, there are plenty of ways to pass time which include watching TV, playing games and so on. Though some would go for books rather than TV because they believe that books play a major role in developing imagination and language skills. This essay highly favours on the side of rendered ideology. However many points are need to be considered in the following paragraphs.
Reading books are zoomed as an out dated way. But people are in the century to accept that it is the classical way that won’t get influenced by any other means. There are researches done on how reading books influence our brain and the results are surprising that it stimulate the storage area in brain’s temporal lobe and language area in frontal lobe. Books are universally accepted to boost people’s imagination in the form of poetries. Trending way of imposing our ideas in social media through podcasts are majorly depend on books.
From kinder garden to higher grades, going through many different books will obviously accelerate the pupil’s language skills. Nowadays schools have increasingly well-developed library just to impose the rich habit of reading books. Though there r plenty of professions accessible after schooling, still some people pick up masters in language. This just shows that book worms are occupying the globe to a certain percentage than preferring the other entertainment field of professions. They believe that books are the backbone for creativity and communication web than just watching tv.
However in this online era, spending time on tv cannot be zoned into waste of time. In present day television , there are handful of shows telecasting regarding science, general knowledge, academic quizzes and so on. But this useful topics which grow creativity and language just occupies minimum percentage in television. There must be a great control needed in humans to skip the entertainment part and focus on the necessity in television that makes it harder to gain positivity.
To conclude, books are standard and universally accepted path for language development and boost people’s creativity. Though the online access in television is a growing trend now for human’s personal development, some people still prefer books than television and it is the massively accepted way to our mind’s demand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | trung8a208 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | trung8a208 | 92 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | trung8a208 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | trung8a208 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | i98yy | 84 | view |
- Nowadays parents are allowing their children to use tablets and smartphones to enhance learning Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- some would go for books rather than TV because they believe that books play a major role in developing imagination and language skills 73
- Humans might speak one language someday in future Do you agree or disagree 73
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
I sincerely believe that…
I sincerely believe that distraction is a priority. There are many ways to entertain yourself. I prefer to play at online casinos, which you can find at https://gamblingorb-gr.com/kazino-online/ . I've tried them and I've made a lot of money, which is why I can proudly recommend them to you.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...vours on the side of rendered ideology. However many points are need to be considered i...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...considered in the following paragraphs. Reading books are zoomed as an out dated...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it stimulate the storage area in brain’s temporal lobe and language area in front...
^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...cial media through podcasts are majorly depend on books. From kinder garden to high...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... garden to higher grades, going through many different books will obviously accelerate the pup...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nication web than just watching tv. However in this online era, spending time on tv...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...waste of time. In present day television , there are handful of shows telecasting...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
.... In present day television , there are handful of shows telecasting regarding science...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... television , there are handful of shows telecasting regarding science, general k...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, still, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20854271357 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76405767379 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2130321705 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9523809524 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09523809524 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119138985991 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360565866906 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352964841941 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691252499772 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176555069196 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.