Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that growing up in the usage of computers and mobile phones for communication could set a bad effect on teenagers’ reading and writing skills. There are some drawbacks to this trend, but I would argue this is a positive trend.
On the one hand, the increase in private device usage could make the youngster become dependent on those devices. With the development of technology in this era, the way people communicate is much different from before. For that reason, young people use modern technology devices in almost part of their life such as chatting, doing homework, or reading books instead of traditional methods. For example, students this day usually do their homework on the computer, which means they do not have to read and write on paper anymore. This stuff could affect those pupils reading and writing abilities.
On the other hand, using private computers and mobile phones for communication brings young people a great number of benefits. First and foremost, it could help students to improve their reading and writing speed or even to develop their brains in various ways. Take reading books as an example, teenagers use private computers and mobile phones to read books, which could not only provide them with a large amount of knowledge in the shortest time but also assist them in enhancing reading speed because they can adjust the number of words when they read. In addition, the education system in most countries still lets students read and write on paper. In this case, communicating by using private computers and mobile phones would help teenagers to be better at reading and writing skills. For instance, students in class still have to do the homework in the traditional method and they can take advance of using mobile phones to study.
All things considered, although there are some negative effects of communicating by private devices but its advantages outweigh the disadvantages in developing young people reading and writing skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-16 | Mollymaul | 75 | view |
| 2024-05-18 | lalo | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | wholemilk | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | jessie7777 | 84 | view |
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate online and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 67
- In many countries the governments like to spend more money on the arts Some people agree with this However others think government should spend more on health and education Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate online and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 80
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10091743119 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57228903412 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510703363914 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3672789498 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373824535163 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138120091118 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866051226339 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240042165695 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349426931175 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.