Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems. What are the problems? What could be done to solve the problems?
These days, it is common to see bicycles and cars using the same road in many countries all over the world, especially developing countries. This leads to some issues which have detrimental impacts on demand for mobility. This essay will give some feasible measures to ameliorate these problems.
It is undeniable that sharing the same road between cyclists and car drivers may result in severe problems. The possibly of accidents between a car and a bicycle is much higher than traveling in separated lanes due to size and speed. Bicycles are smaller than cars, so it is difficult for cars to see them every time, especially when car drivers run with high speed. For example, many accidents in Vietnam are caused by car drivers and cyclists participating in similar road. In addition, the proliferation of cars and bicycles is more likely to lead to traffic congestion, especially rush hours. For instance, a car has to slow down when a commuter rides a bike with the average speed in front of it. As a result, some behind cars also slow down or even stop to wait, so this can cause traffic jams.
In order to mitigate the aforementioned problems, some solutions should be employed. First, public education needs to ensure that car drivers possibly consider to cyclists as well as learning how to drive safely when bicycles are sharing the same road. For example, car drivers should reduce their speed and be aware of surrounding when travelling on the road used for both cars and bicycles. Furthermore, the government also should invest to build distinct lanes for these two vehicles. Consequently, each vehicle can run with its own speed and does not affect others. An example can be seen as more and more European countries like Netherlands start to build separate lands for bicycles.
In conclusion, cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause serious accidents and traffic congestion. To ease these problem, car drivers should learn how to drive safely when travelling the same road with bicycles and the government needs to consider constructing distinct lanes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-04 | tienallen' | 73 | view |
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation What is your opinion 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports for younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Other disagree Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...cidents and traffic congestion. To ease these problem, car drivers should learn how to drive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00287356322 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64404513945 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508620689655 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1328966966 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.7222222222 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258613328646 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881659202724 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790361794247 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175919806827 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871279537157 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.