• Task 2: Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis and metro on vehicle-free days. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There are vehicle-free days in some metropolises when private transportations is prohibited from the city center. Instead of that, public transport is advisable. Although this phenomenon brings disadvantages, I think the benefit is more significant.
Admittedly, vehicle-free days have a negative impact on traffic and participants’ traffic. Firstly, the prohibition of private transportations hinders citizens when they get to the city center. If they use public vehicles, it is less comfortable as buses or taxis are usually crowded because of the high volume of people going to the center. Besides, travelling by public transportations is more time-consuming because you must follow the time in advance. Secondly, the outskirts are more likely to have traffic jams on vehicle-free days. To be more specific, when private vehicles are limited in the center, they tend to choose an alternative way in the outskirts and the sharp escalation of traffic flows lead to the congestion.
However, the merits overwhelm the negative effects. The first advantage is that the encouragement of public transports can notably diminish CO2 emission. Hence, it is beneficial to the environment, avoids the ‘greenhouse effect’ and the quality of air improving facilitates better conditions for society health. The second one is vehicle-free days create a ventilated space for other society activities due to the disappearance of private vehicles. Thanks to that, people and the government can organize some festivals, games and so on. For example, in Hanoi, vehicles are banned in streets around HoanKiem lake on the weekends and there are dance or sing performances, games, marathon matches and events, which attracts not only residents but also foreign visitors.
In conclusion, vehicle-free days have both negative and positive impact but its merit is more remarkable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | too3ig | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | too3ig | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | minh phương phạm hồng | 89 | view |
- Task 1 The charts below show the percentages of men and women aged 60 64 in employment in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 1 The charts below give information about children under 18 learning musical instruments in one region of the UK in 1996 and 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Task 1 The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 1 The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Task 1 The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...act but its merit is more remarkable.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59154929577 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23945192893 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602112676056 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5906374715 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398494445363 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120661885148 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116100430783 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239556318449 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702766581365 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.