The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now.
The map illustrates the modify of Pebbleton village in the period of 20 years.
Generally, it is clearly seen that there is a major change of the Pebbleton village, there have been some recently built facilities for the villagers which building’s functions were also changed to suit the needs of the community here.
Specifically, the number of houses along the north coast of the village increased from 4 to 7 buildings, to the left of which is now the new Community Center. Meanwhile, the brand-new tennis court was constructed on the left side of the light houses’ road. Lastly, a new pedestrian bridge between the school and Pebbleton has been built to facilitate the traveling between it.
The quantity of residential areas has grown since the coastal fort has been replaced with a children’s playground. In addition, the film studio has been converted into a residential apartment, and a newly built pathway has connected the flat to the revenue court. Last but not least, the playing field in the southern and the lighthouse in the western were remain undisturbed.
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 78
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 61
- The following pie chart shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two different years
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The map illustrates the modify of Pebbleton village in the period of 2...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...thern and the lighthouse in the western were remain undisturbed.
^^^^
Line 4, column 357, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... and the lighthouse in the western were remain undisturbed.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05027932961 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84319673478 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620111731844 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7873822685 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122683654184 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531194841533 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707147692623 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910579246391 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786879460079 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.