The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996, 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia
The given table illustrates the numbers of travellers in 6 different World Heritage destinations in Australia between 1996 and 2000.
It is clear that the figures for Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve and Macquarie Island decreased, while there were increases in the numbers of visitors in the remaining sites. Moreover, the Great Barrier Reef was the most attractive tourist destination during the period shown.
In 1996, the Great Barrier Reef had 1,670,000 guests, and this value then doubled and reached a peak at 3,200,000 in 2000. Similarly, there were significantly lower numbers of those who paid visits to Blue Mountains and Tasmania Wilderness in the first year of the period, at 526,000 and 450,000, respectively. In addition, while the statistics of Tasmania Wilderness rose gradually by 33,000, that of Blue Mountains had a greater growth of 55,000 at the end of the period.
By contrast, Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve held the second highest position during the time frame, although this site witnessed a marginal drop in its figure from 810,000 to 770,000. On that same note, Macquarie Island was the least favourable destination over a 4-year period, having only 350 travellers at the beginning and its number even hit a bottom after 2 years. Moreover, Shark Bay saw a small gain to 102,000 in its figure in 1998, but this then went down and maintained its second lowest position since the beginning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | Bennhehe | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | lnthuyvan | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | Johndavisvu | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 80
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2010 to 2014 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, similarly, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20779220779 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71519347967 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.910153526 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113191243904 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527793579771 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074824056321 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953692646883 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894384633493 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.