With growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas. Is it a positive or negative development?
In recent years, society has witnessed overpopulation in urban areas leading to increases in the number of individuals living in accommodations with small or no outdoor spaces. From my perspectives, although doing this has several certain advantages, the drawbacks may be far more significant.
On the one hand, it can be seen that some minor benefits of spending life in small houses are counted. One possible advantage is that living in a home with little space can be admitted as an economic solution for non-enough-income families. As a result, people would save money because they rent accommodations at an adorable price in the city centre; therefore, they can spend these savings on other human’s demands. Another beneficial effect could be that having a life in a small house gives people a chance to strengthen the relationship and the coziness between members of their family. In fact, every single person meets each other more frequently, therefore, they have time for gathering and sharing a plenty of things in their daily life.
Nevertheless, the fact that living in a home with small and no outdoor space can have major downsides which overshadow these positive impacts. The most obvious issue could be that physical health problems would emerge in people who live in limited surroundings. It is a matter of fact, the lack of outdoor space affects the cross-ventilation in the room which leads to respiration disorders. Moreover, individuals living in this kind of housing are unable to do any outdoor activities; as a consequence, this limitation causes an increase in obesity cases and even cardiovascular-related diseases. The second drawback is worth mentioning could show living in those atmospheres for a long time somehow influences the mental health of human beings. To be specific, a living environment that lacks of sunlight and natural air can make people feel suffocated; consequently, this causes an increase in the likelihood of depression and thereby a decrease in work efficiency. Another adverse impact could be that multiple-generation families living in small and narrow accommodations would usually face the starvation of privacy for each member. The children, for instance, might be hard to get a serene environment for conducting their own studies.
To sum up, although spending life in a small accommodation has some potential benefits for any-income families, however, in terms of a healthy lifestyle, the negative effects on material and spiritual living are more meaningful towards the acceptance from each individual.
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 56
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 61
- Different people have different approaches to life Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences Which category do you fall into and why 73
- Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good social skills in addition to good qualifications Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in a job 73
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinions 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'small accommodation'.
Suggestion: small accommodation
... To sum up, although spending life in a small accommodation has some potential benefits for any-inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, for instance, in fact, kind of, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34814814815 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22333739749 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565432098765 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3064170719 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.375 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245405592051 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763997959722 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697200335169 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153708112331 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411350722536 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'small accommodation'.
Suggestion: small accommodation
... To sum up, although spending life in a small accommodation has some potential benefits for any-inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, for instance, in fact, kind of, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34814814815 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22333739749 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565432098765 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3064170719 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.375 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245405592051 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763997959722 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697200335169 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153708112331 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411350722536 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.