Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
The view that making recycling part of the law is the only way to tackle the problem of little recycled household waste is still open to debate. From my perspective, policymakers can impose regulations on recycling, but it is not the sole measure of the environmental issue mentioned.
Among the explanations cited to support authorities in passing laws on recycling is the existing reality of recycling domestic waste. Nowadays, it is the case that many citizens seldom spontaneously participate in the recycling process in most circumstances due to their negligence or lack of time. Once recycling becomes a legal requirement, more and more households will follow as a civic responsibility. Having those laws imposed will also hit the psyche of those who have not recycled their waste before since many fear getting involved in fines. Furthermore, the regulations may make people more careful about their household waste production, which has created a throw-away society influenced by consumerism.
However, it had better be noticed that recycling laws are not the only solution to the issue that only a little domestic waste is recycled. Education should also be among the top priorities in dealing with this issue. It is advisable that politicians put environmental education, in the place of legal regulations, at the centre of recycling campaigns. For instance, students at school should learn about recycling through several lessons in the standard curriculum or extracurricular projects organized by their schools. Moreover, lessening the production of household product packaging can be a measure. A large proportion of domestic waste comes from the plastic packaging of the products people use daily. If this quantity of packaging were limited from the beginning or environmentally optimally produced, the recycling problem would become less severe. Authorities, therefore, can impose stricter regulations on packaging-producing businesses to deal with the issue of recycling.
In conclusion, recycling laws can be essential but not the only solution to the problem of little domestic waste being recycled besides education and packaging-producing reduction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 90
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 82
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 95
- Today many people want to get married and have children at their thirty rather than when they are young Is this a positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58484848485 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28219869643 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.550325633 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.1875 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343926641011 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111142773499 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080142804168 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225948495555 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411439721162 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.