Asteroid Colonization
The passage talks about the idea of colonizing the asteroids and there potential benefits. While the lecture disagrees to the fact that colonizing asteroids is beneficial. The reasons are specified below.
Firstly, the passage says that asteroids provide the unique environment for scientific research and researches conducted in these environment provide very valuable information to many academic fields. The lecturer contradicts to the fact that colonizing is possible of asteroid as there is lack of knowledge about asteroids. It is not even known that how much asteroids are present and resources availabe on asteroids.
Secondly, the passage says that natural resources mining on the asteroids can create the new industries and job opportunities by which revenue generation is possible which leads to economic growth. On the other hand the lecturer says that we not even know that how much mineral present on the asteroid and whether it would be cost effective to start mining them. Hence the economic growth would not be possible.
Lastly, the passage says that colonization is helpfull for the long term human settlement, it can be helpfull at time of disasters. However the lecturer disagrees to the fact of human settlement as there is no gravity on the asteroids and hence there is moving difficulty and also it can make bone and muscle damage.
Thus we can conclude that although the passage talks about the benefits of colonizing asteroids the lecture contradicts to the points made in passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 93 | view |
| 2023-05-28 | Atharva_Bhide188 | 80 | view |
| 2023-05-28 | Soham Chinchalkar | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-11 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | monica1315 | 83 | view |
- friends 66
- Sea otters 73
- students 66
- Sea otters 73
- student grades 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...asteroids and there potential benefits. While the lecture disagrees to the fact that ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this environment' or 'these environments'?
Suggestion: this environment; these environments
...ic research and researches conducted in these environment provide very valuable information to ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...steroids. It is not even known that how much asteroids are present and resources ava...
^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...be cost effective to start mining them. Hence the economic growth would not be possib...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t can be helpfull at time of disasters. However the lecturer disagrees to the fact of h...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... it can make bone and muscle damage. Thus we can conclude that although the passa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28099173554 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77892485176 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49173553719 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2545441005 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390910497163 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165356716378 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137415314678 0.0662205650399 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256683532849 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127100228246 0.0443174109184 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.