Topic: It is true that traveling to other countries helps us understand other cultures and their traditions.
In recent years, tourism has been booming on an unprecedented scale with a number of citizens traveling around the world. Indeed, traveling is a beneficial approach to improving self-development. From my perspective, I contend that this approach should be encouraged and widely disseminated among people.
One major ground behind the reason why I totally see eye to eye with this notion is that travelers taking the tour are provided with not only personal solace but also valuable experiences. This is because, although today people might obtain instant access to a wealth of information about other countries customs and traditions, they still do not have an engaging and dynamic experience. Thus, it is likely that they can remember these customs in a short period of time, and probably forget them quickly due to not having a profound remembrance of those traditions. In contrast, when it comes to a practical journey to other nations, not only being let them steam off but also a valuable opportunity for them to have a thought-provoking experience about local’s life. To give an example, in Western countries such as the USA, or England, younger people before attending higher institutions, often take a gap year to embark on an exciting journey to other areas with the aim of experiencing. In addition, they might stay with local residents, harmony with them, and gradually cement the friendship, which people cannot acquire from any book.
Another reason for lying is that traveling is a significant method to acquire knowledge proactively. Indeed, people often being imparted knowledge by a rigid curriculum at institutions, as well as having to devote a great deal of time to do research. In the long-term, this way is likely to give rise to people daunted. On the contrary, traveling is an ideal option for them to not only let their hair down but also actively broaden their horizons about various unique customs and traditions. Furthermore, travel plays an important role to help people grow both personally and professionally. Exploring many places, trying dynamic activities, and meeting new people can broaden their perspectives and deepen their understanding of the world. It is often the case of youngsters who have a tendency to attain a local job in different areas with the aim of having a well-rounded knowledge of many life aspects.
In conclusion, I hold a strong belief that traveling abroad is an advantageous approach to enhancing people’s knowledge as well as a worthwhile experience. Therefore, governments should do flavors and incentivize residents to go traveling by cutting extra transportation costs and extensive media coverage.
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Topic Some people argue that we should do research into our family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations 56
- Topic Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of pre school age Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Topic Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The table shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y can remember these customs in a short period of time, and probably forget them quickly due t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2251.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25934579439 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08107592687 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565420560748 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0999770846 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.055555556 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13774707845 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414936437086 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036290327918 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738383620302 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267565756537 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y can remember these customs in a short period of time, and probably forget them quickly due t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2251.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25934579439 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08107592687 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565420560748 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0999770846 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.055555556 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13774707845 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414936437086 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036290327918 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738383620302 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267565756537 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.