The best way to ensure children's growth is to make parents take parenting courses. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many parents are now seeking methods to fully develop their child’s potential as they always wish their children to become well-grown people as much as possible. Some individuals, therefore, believe that taking a parenting course is the only available way to ensure a child’s development; however, this essay will challenge this school of thought since alternative forms would be as effective.
Granted, one may argue that knowledge obtained from parenting courses may be useful and constructive considering its quality. However, it fails to factor in the practicality and suitability for a particular situation given that every child is born different and has grown from an individualistic background, so they need to be an individualized approach to each child’s maturation. For example, an autistic child needs to have a personalized developing program that is suitable for their unique disorder. Otherwise, they would not fully cultivate their talents.
Rather than attend a parenting course, parents should consider referring to information from online communities, especially from those whose children have similar experiences. Thanks to the advent of technology, many communities are springing up allowing people from every corner of the world to have a chance to communicate with others. This provides parents with platforms to confess and ask for advice from other parents. Not only can they get useful and practical information from already-experienced people, but they can also have many options and advice to consider and make use of. This can be evidenced by the number of communal groups on Facebook created to help new parents take care of their babies. Here, some seasoned experts can introduce their approaches to assist parents in creating schemes for their child’s growth.
In conclusion, while courses are believed to be a valuable way for parents to ensure a child's growth, their efficacy is limited due to their general information. Parents should take into consideration to take references from other sources, such as from communal communities, to acquire guidance for their child’s development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-18 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- Directors of large organizations receive much higher salaries than ordinary workers Some think it is necessary while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Overpopulation is the world s most serious environmental problem to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Younger individuals are happier with life than elderly folks are Do you agree or disagree 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram below shows how glass is recycled Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52599388379 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04389358912 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587155963303 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4378785422 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.071428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22592210545 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881785358607 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680274010809 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156050125267 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688655271564 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52599388379 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04389358912 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587155963303 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4378785422 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.071428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22592210545 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881785358607 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680274010809 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156050125267 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688655271564 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.