We are able to judge people by their appearance.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Views vary differently about whether judgments on others can count on how they look from the outside. I would have an unfavourable opinion of critiquing people by their external appearance from my perspective and stand my approval of judging individuals by other internal aspects, particularly their personality and way of thinking.
Cited to support my notion, making judgments about other people based on their intrinsic facets allow constructive communication to develop. As a saying once stated, “Do not judge a book by its cover,” each individual has more to show about themselves than just appearance. Being unavoidable among most people, judging by looks, by contrast, may prevent them from the need for learning more about others. However, once they decide to take one step closer to their personality and other internal aspects, they might have an improved sense of comfort whenever they are around them, and they can strengthen their relationships via communicating to learn mutually.
Furthermore, though the idea of judging by appearance cannot be denied, it cannot stand up to scrutiny, in my opinion. Opponents of my viewpoint state that looks are essential for the first impression, which can initially spring to mind when they think of others. Nevertheless, I may argue against this view for two reasons. Firstly, critiques based on appearance can be one-sided owing to causing people to underestimate others since they, as mentioned, can allow people to ignore others in the place of knowing more about them with willingness or even caution. Secondly, most often say, “Looks can be deceiving.” In other words, we may misjudge other people if we only rely on their appearance. For instance, someone with tattoos and one with a student look might be associated with rude behaviours and polite acts, respectively. Nonetheless, nobody can ensure that only the tattooed person can be a wrongdoer.
In conclusion, I do not believe that we can critique other individuals through their extrinsic looks and show my virtually entire belief in the opinion of judging others by other intrinsic aspects, such as how they behave or think.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 84
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your opinion 56
- Some people say that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 90
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sports or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views an 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25872093023 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89996683883 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572674418605 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1965336134 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.214285714 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182186625561 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667213727107 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046333161459 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119777383903 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226145933951 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25872093023 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89996683883 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572674418605 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1965336134 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.214285714 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182186625561 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667213727107 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046333161459 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119777383903 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226145933951 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.