Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work.
Recently, the building design has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what are the positive and negative consequences of modern building design?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that it has various effects on people’s life, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the constructional standpoint, designing new buildings is bound up inextricably with engineering advancements, which indicates they lead to both skyscrapers and huge dams. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and a comfortable lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in substantial profits. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of damaging influences is correlated positively with not only forming public attitude but also regulatory policy reform.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, cultural crisis attribute to forgetting traditional construction, in that it would come down to city perspectives, municipality, and parks. A salient example of such attribution is a social agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take alternative strategy for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of mega structures.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that there are some reasons to support the effectiveness of modern construction. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | Vindictassas | view |
- Medical technology can increase the human s life expectancy Is it blessing or curse Medical technology is responsible for the human s life expectancy To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The 18th century due to industrialization a lot of people migrate to develop countries This affected lifestyle and increased major problems in develop countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people s life and work 88
- With the advancement in technology the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased Some people believe that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals Real change can be made at the government level What extent do you agree or disagree 85
Comments
Building design can have a…
Building design can have a significant impact on the way people live and work. A well-designed building can create a positive environment that promotes productivity, creativity and well-being. On the other hand, a poorly designed building can have the opposite effect, leading to stress, discomfort and reduced performance. The article https://www.visual-craft.com/blog/how-do-you-use-prototyping-to-make-creative-design-decisions/ , emphasizes the importance of prototyping for creative design decisions. The article emphasizes that prototyping allows designers to interact with the product and conduct user tests, which can lead to a final decision with fewer errors, saving time and resources. When it comes to building design, prototyping can be particularly useful for identifying potential problems with the layout, lighting, and overall atmosphere of a building.
Very often at work I am…
Very often at work I am faced with the need to create several project options, these may be customer requirements. Therefore, sometimes there is simply not enough time to create quality images,. But I found a solution to this problem, I use a high-quality library of vector photos, vector photos meeting. From experience, I can say that customers are satisfied that they have the opportunity to consider several options and choose the best one.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79094076655 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31973292481 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.710801393728 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6901016295 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.846153846 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150104111796 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398272079198 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690283080909 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928652678692 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118660799584 0.0609392437508 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 55.0591133005 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.