Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?
Recently, the phenomenon of giving students’ works late has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what are the positive and negative consequences?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that deducting marks from students’ works is unacceptable, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, being on-time is bound up inextricably with doing homework without any delay, which indicates they lead to both discipline and hand in assignments. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between educational strategies and a stressful lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in failure rates. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of major problems is correlated positively with not only changing public attitude but also curriculum policy reform.
Within the realm of university plans, without the slightest doubt, final exams attribute to cognitive learning, in that it would come down to being successful, effective appraisal, and an academic degree. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a feasible solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of surveillance and education.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that there are some reasons to support the idea of being on-time. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-05 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2021-02-21 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | jsrc | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
- With all the troubles in the world today money spent on space exploration is a complete waste The money could be better spent on other things To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and give any relevant example or experience 80
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops What is your opinion about this Discuss with appropriate examples 85
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 55
- For a successful company selling products depends more on company s reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63175675676 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17926586881 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689189189189 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0755208167 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.230769231 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152061691204 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414279438496 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702167017049 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949805040217 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110053835306 0.0609392437508 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.