The Chart shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
You should write at least 150 words
This graph indicates the figure of individuals who took a keen interest on visiting a local movie theater in 2000.
Generally, the figure of residents who were interested in moving to the cinema at the age of 55 and over accounted for the highest rate of the total proportion. On the contrary, people aged 31 to 45 were at the lowest level
Particularly, the graph illustrates that the elderly who were at the age of 55 accounted half of the proportion. There was a 20% lower rate for teenagers ages 10 to 15, about 21%, which is similar to the elderly. This figure was 5% higher than the data on people from 16 to 20. Nearly 8% of persons in their 20s agreed to spend their time hanging out to the surveyed movie theater. The lowest percentage, about 5%, belonged to customers from 31 to 45 years old. The highest rate, of nearly 11%, was among customers who were between the ages of 46 and 55. All other age groups had rates between 5% and 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-27 | Taytor2609 | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 56
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... visiting a local movie theater in 2000. Generally, the figure of residents who w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e aged 31 to 45 were at the lowest level Particularly, the graph illustrates that...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44886363636 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46838873024 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.834203426 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116554061997 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501694431768 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250786833354 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828813435721 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00760915589004 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.