It is very important that children should study hard at school Time spent studying on the Internet is time wasted Do you agree or disagree You should write at least 250 words

In these days of highly developed technology, it cannot be denied that the Internet is able to assist students in studying. Some take a view that the students had better prioritize their academic study at school rather than waste time learning on the Internet. From my point of view, I totally agree with this statement in the light of benefits we can gain from applying the Internet into education.

First of all, studying on the Internet is interactive and efficient. It can not be denied that the Internet provides children with a wide range of resources including websites, videos, quizzes, etc. Thanks to this requirements, students can easily review old lessons if they do not grasp it well in class. Therefore, they can remember the lesson better and get extra knowledge. Moreover, learners can hold a meeting with their friends to study together via apps and as you know, seeing others studying motivates them a lot.
Secondly, it is snug for children to study online. Many studying apps now are designed with the aim not only to support students' study but also to relax. Subsequently, students can study without stress. Furthermore, they can find studying more attractive and make their studying better. In other words, students can study whatever they want and study anytime, anywhere. As a result, they will not be limited by the knowledge at school.

In conclusion, although studying hard at school is necessary for adolescents, I strongly agree that time spent studying on the Internet is as essential as studying at school, and should not be considered as wasted time activity.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...bsites, videos, quizzes, etc. Thanks to this requirements, students can easily revie...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, you know, as a result, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03396226415 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66847156197 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588679245283 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5345534244 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339819773738 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112703238191 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113406961211 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239232117954 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144981171999 0.056905535591 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.