Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
An increasing number of people are opting for alternative medicines and treatments instead of coming to their usual doctors to heal their diseases. In my view, this should be perceived as negative trend for two main reasons.
Firstly, the alternative medicines and treatments methods are not clinically tested. Although it could be argued that a few patients become healthy after trying these methods, they still have a flaw. To illustrate, despite an alternative medicine helps patients to reduce pain due to their diseases, the number of doctors do not know the drug truly can cure the patient. Furthermore, people who recommend this kind of medicines and treatments do not have knowledge to explain how the methods work. It is, therefore, clear how this type of medicines are still doubted by many doctors.
Secondly, the number of people that use these kind of medicines probably get other diseases. This is mainly because alternative drugs have other effects other than cure the main disease that lead to complication. Take some alternative drug users for example who consume herbal drugs to heal cancer while their bodies metabolism are affected by herbal drugs that cause their organs does not work well, which in turn, increase the risk of death. Thus, people must study more the side effects of any kind of alternative medicines before consuming them. In contrast, attending usual doctors is less dangerous if we follow their advice because they have learned many researches and give a proportional medication recipes.
To sum up, trying herbal medicines and treatments are not only doubtful, but also leads to the possibility of facing a lot of medical problems. I, therefore, remain firmly convinced that using alternative drugs and treatments brings a negative trend for society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 56 | view |
| 2024-09-01 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this question Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...Secondly, the number of people that use these kind of medicines probably get other disease...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in contrast, kind of, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23183391003 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6649934087 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570934256055 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4195472008 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296193613565 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106952289228 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709917109415 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194879968541 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610781003986 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...Secondly, the number of people that use these kind of medicines probably get other disease...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in contrast, kind of, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23183391003 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6649934087 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570934256055 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4195472008 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296193613565 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106952289228 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709917109415 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194879968541 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610781003986 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.