People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
It is true that many people believe that government bodies should tackle environmental issues by raising fuel expense for transport vehicles. Personally, I argue that not only rising fuel cost might be ineffective in solving environment problems, but it also results in a higher rate of crime and have an adverse bearing on the economy, which is negative overall and governments should find other solutions.
The first one is an increasing crime grade resulting from a rise in the unemployment rate. This is because the income of many people in recent years comes from doing jobs such as drivers or delivery men. If the authorities raise the fuel prices, those people might struggle to make ends meet as higher fuel expenses result in higher delivery fees or higher taxi costs, which leads to a decrease in the number of costumers. This could make drivers and delivery men become unemployed and lead to a higher rate of criminals.
Furthermore, it could have negative repercussions on the economy of the world. Petroleum and other types of fuel enterprises have a significant contribution to the economic growth of many nations. Therefore, if the higher cost of fuel rise lead to significant less consumers, those corporations might have to suffer greatly in terms of their revenue. Additionally, it would increase the prices of other types of products, from commodities to construction materials. The economy, as a result, could experience a period of stagnation or deflation.
In conclusion, I believe that the authorities should find other methods to solve the problems of environment instead of raising the prices of vehicles fuel, which results in an increase in the crime rate and greatly damage the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- Many young people today change their jobs or careers every few years More advantages than disadvantages 78
- Some people believe that watching television is bad for children in every way Others however say that television is good for children to develop as they grow up Discuss both views and give opinion 89
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...use the income of many people in recent years comes from doing jobs such as drivers o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun consumers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...r cost of fuel rise lead to significant less consumers, those corporations might hav...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8947877156 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0250403978 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230594053878 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790991643115 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752010975163 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158589353668 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808514451538 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...use the income of many people in recent years comes from doing jobs such as drivers o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun consumers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...r cost of fuel rise lead to significant less consumers, those corporations might hav...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8947877156 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0250403978 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230594053878 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790991643115 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752010975163 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158589353668 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808514451538 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.