In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which do you think is appropriate in today’s world?
it is widely debated about the main target of secondary education. While students in secondary schools are required to have general knowledge of many different subjects in some nations, children in others focus on some specific subjects related to their future path. I believe that a programme which contains a wide range of subjects would be a better choice despite the possible benefits of a career-oriented study programme.
To begin with, the idea of equipping students with a variety of subjects is beneficial because career orientation seems to be more suitable in higher education programmes, since students in secondary schools often lack experience and awareness about the job world. Therefore, it might be too early for them to decide their future career at such a young age. Consequently, secondary schools should provide their pupils with a diversity of subjects to help students explore their preference, as well as their strengths and weaknesses to orient their future most effectively and suitably in high schools. Otherwise, by narrowing the number of compulsory subjects, secondary schools may fail to develop their students’ potential in different fields, which is believed to be the mission of basic education.
Another reason is that students who are more knowledgeable, especially in many fields, might be more competitive in the workplace. Nowadays, as some jobs are gradually vanishing, people are required to have knowledge of a large number of fields. A good example is teachers in middle schools in Vietnam, who have to teach all sections of science subjects instead of physics, chemistry and biology separately due to the latest changes of the curriculum. Moreover, having basic information in various areas could help students to get more lucrative job opportunities. For example, employees who have a good command of languages are preferred by employers as they may need to cooperate with foreign businesses.
In conclusion, although it is promising to design a study curriculum with a number of particular subjects related to pupils’ career choice, it is more suitable for secondary schools to educate their students elemental knowledge of numerous areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | hamy221799 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | Chien2k8 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | vishal sachdeva | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | i98yy | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | dhruv j patel | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is widely debated about the main target...
^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e required to have general knowledge of many different subjects in some nations, children in o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eople are required to have knowledge of a large number of fields. A good example is teachers in m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to cooperate with foreign businesses. In conclusion, although it is promising ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...esses. In conclusion, although it is promising to design a study curriculum with a num...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42274052478 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96455443336 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542274052478 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4806459179 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.076923077 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235349109999 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808106250534 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825834655471 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163945737206 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990662533682 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.