The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graphs illustrate the average proportion of sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar contained in Americans different meals of a day.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is evident that Americans consume more sugar during day-time meals and snacks. In contrast, the 2 other types of nutrients are consumed more in dinners.
For breakfast, people in the US have a healthy meal with considerably equal proportion of nutrients, with 14% of sodium and sugar, and 16% of saturated fat. The percentage of sodium and fat then witnesses a considerable increase of 15% and 10%, respectively, during the next meal of the day.
In terms of snack, its figure for added sugar is the highest, at 42%. The data for the other nutrients in snack are significantly lower than sugar, at lower than 22%. Dinner has the most proportion of sodium and saturated fat, at 43% and 37%, for each. The percentage of added sugar in dinner is 23%, which is more than 13% lower than the remaining nutrients.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
2023-11-10 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
2023-10-10 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Many people now use written language in a less formal and more relaxed way than in the past Why is this the case Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8875739645 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74205295023 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0363756538 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0693308688852 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342169553529 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253178170273 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472564195688 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102907808524 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.