Mars
The lecture and the passage discuss whether there is some living forms on Mars or not. In the passage, it gives three discoveries about this topic, but in the lecture, all of them are controdicted by three reasons.
To start with, the author suggests that people can see some small fossils on the meteorite that is similar to the shape of bacteria on Earth. However, the lecturer refutes the argument and claims that the small fossils are just look like the living things on Earth. With different direction to view these fossils, they may change and they are not in proportion.
Moreover, the reading part mentions that some chemical compounds found in the meteorite exist the bacterial origin. Nevertheless, the listening part challenges that they might be the something relevant with volcano because there are a huge amount of volcanos on Mars.
Lastly, the article illustrates that researchers find a magnetic mineral in the meteorite that is the same as the magnetite grains appeared on Earth. The lecture cast doubt on it and argues that the magnetic field on Mars is weak, so that the bacteria cannot follow it. Therefore, this discovery is useless and there is no living sources on Mars.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-01-10 | Shahjahan khandakar | 73 | view |
2023-09-09 | xujia | 75 | view |
2023-09-08 | joeyrussell007 | 3 | view |
2023-08-27 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 78 | view |
2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 85 | view |
- One Child Policy 70
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 66
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society toregard any living man or woman as a hero 66
- here are doubts about whether some paintings are painted by him a representation of these paintings is Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a white Bonnet 81
- Pterosaurs 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...t with volcano because there are a huge amount of volcanos on Mars. Lastly, the ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 202.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9702970297 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50348252686 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5185643952 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.4 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104615190251 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445150400585 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895420601337 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066539959111 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672387452147 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...t with volcano because there are a huge amount of volcanos on Mars. Lastly, the ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 202.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9702970297 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50348252686 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5185643952 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.4 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104615190251 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445150400585 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895420601337 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066539959111 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672387452147 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.