Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development?
In this contemporary epoch, thanks to the advent of the Internet, advertisements are growing increasingly popular and become prominent in our daily life, leading some to ponder the consequences. From my perspective, I firmly believe that it is an overall negative phenomenon and should be unwelcomed.
There are certain stands why I reckon that the surge in quantities of commercials exerts several adverse impacts on customers. The first and perhaps the most persuasive reason is that it has become a nuisance to many people. Specifically, in the light of technological booming era, commercials has been rising on an unprecedented scale, with pop-ups, flyers and billboards being virtually everywhere. By this I mean, customers are often bombarded with all kinds of advertisements, making it increasingly challenging for them to be well-informed about a new line of product. Another reason is that advertising can be a dangerous distraction to drivers and pedestrians, as many billboards and posters with glaring neon lights and signs are placed around important intersections, which can be extremely hazardous. Last but not least, several ads attempt to tempt people into making unnecessary purchases. To illustrate, celebrity endorsement is used in many extravagant commercials to stimulate people to buy products that are of little use to them. For example, OPPO usually uses marketing strategies with famous characters such as Son Tung M-TP, Toc Tien, etc. to promote their smartphones, although they are often considered badly-designed.
Some opponents may insist that only by advertising can companies approach prospective customers. The most obvious proof is that were it not for commercials, it would be very difficult for sellers to get their products to the marketplace, and for buyers to be informed of new commodities. This view seems plausible at first; nevertheless, if their goods were appealing enough, they would not need to render advertising. For instance, Apple Inc rarely launches advertising campaigns for their line of product, but according to data compiled over the past 5 years, iPhone X, iPhone XR, iPhone 11, iPhone 12 and iPhone 13 respectively become the most sought-after devices by users.
In conclusion, from the aforementioned points, I reaffirm that commercials are detrimental for its adverse impacts on customers. It is also my recommendation that we should be wise consumers, who can see through those pieces of advertising and make sensible buying decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | MEBC Class | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, i mean, i reckon, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47028423773 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26589432487 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617571059432 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0672903602 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.529411765 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0671929576783 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0209643280502 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300686871579 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514989243495 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393005575207 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.