In some countries, online shopping is replacing shopping in stores. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In contemporary settings, people have changed their shopping habits due to the advancement of society. They would rather shop through the Internet than go to stores like before. Personally, I assert that this is a positive development for reasons of the distribution of goods to wider citizens and the availability of land for different purposes.
To begin with, it is irrefutable that online shopping allows for the greater dissemination of myriad merchandise. Thanks to the widespread network, people these days can purchase goods from various origins, thus finding many products suitable for themselves. For instance, they can buy cosmetics from a global brand without having to travel abroad, thereby finding it more convenient. Moreover, this change in shopping patterns also benefits manufacturers. Since their products are accessible to a wider range of clients, they can easily increase their sales and make a huge profit.
Another justification for my endorsement of superseding traditional stores with online shops is the fact that there is much more land available for distinct purposes. Should the majority of conventional shops close, authorities might make use of those areas to construct new multi-purpose infrastructures, which is especially meaningful in the age of overpopulation. To be more specific, more housing estates are required to meet the increasing demand for possessing accommodations. Also, more enterprises need space to expand their manufacturing scale, so as to facilitate more jobs for citizens to make a living. As a result, the closure of shops may meet these legitimate needs of housing and work for almost every citizen.
In summary, online shopping is indubitably advantageous for the community on account of giving convenience to customers, facilitating profit for sellers, and providing more land to the public. Therefore, I strongly believe that the substitution of virtual stores for conventional shops is a positive growth in the modern era.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | chino0301 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-18 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- The continued rise in the world s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time What are the causes of this continued rise Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity 84
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects like philosophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment To wh 84
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ce to expand their manufacturing scale, so as to facilitate more jobs for citizens to ma...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in summary, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52786885246 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19027681636 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3780153389 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17667874843 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709310803124 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574247055482 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128873919961 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042454956557 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.